🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy offers a misguided view of the European Union. It claims that unrestrained immigration and what it terms "progressive" agendas pose an existential risk to European civilization. However, this perspective is based on a serious misreading of the reality. The actual challenge facing the EU is not cultural but technological and economic lag.

A Glaring Growth Gap Between Europe and the US

The data reveal a sobering picture. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by eighty-seven percent, while a mere 13.5% growth for the European Union. Over this period, European income per person dropped from 76.5% to just 50% of the US level. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a higher per capita income than several leading EU nations like France and Italy.

Today, roughly 50% of the global top fifty tech companies are American, while a mere four are European.

The Innovation Deficit: A Critical Question

The growing disparity stems from superior efficiency gains in the United States, fueled by technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The scene of world technology leadership is overwhelmingly American. Over the past five decades, hundreds of American startups have scaled into companies valued at more than ten billion dollars, versus only fourteen in Europe.

This disparity prompts a vital question: As the competition for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, what is the EU positioned? Experts widely concede it is largely a two-horse race between the US and China, with European nations entering at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Technological Lag

A number of key reasons explain this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a far deeper and agile system for financing new ventures. The EU still lacks a genuine capital markets union, which caps the growth potential of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented rules hamper Europe. A American entrepreneur can introduce a service under one regulatory framework to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The EU, despite a larger population size, is divided among 27 separate regimes, creating significant internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a tightly woven innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's long-term lack of spending in defense has weakened its capacity for pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these challenges, one can find reasons for optimism. European leaders are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have started to propose serious reform. Notable reports on European competitiveness and the internal market highlight the need for sweeping changes.

With the right incentives and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths could support much higher degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent still possesses significant strengths: skilled human capital, top-tier education systems, and premier research institutions. Alongside a large internal market and high savings rates, these foundations have the potential to trigger a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in creating cutting-edge tech, it can still significantly boost economic output by implementing and tailoring advancements from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

Europe now faces a decisive crossroads. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, Europe's technological decline has been gradual. But, if it fails to take decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could give way to a sudden and irreversible decline in global economic relevance.